Call us : 406-227-0477

Teflon® Encapsulated O-Rings : FEP vs. PFA in Gas Permeable Applications

The choice between Teflon®  FEP and PFA encapsulation is important, especially in applications where gas permeability is a concern. This blog post explains the characteristics of both materials and the utilization of encapsulation types in Teflon® Encapsulated o-rings.

Understanding Teflon® FEP and PFA  Encapsulation Properties: M-Cor Inc Encapsulated O-Rings: See Permeation Page

Teflon® FEP (Fluorinated Ethylene Propylene):
Lower gas permeability than PFA, makes it an excellent gas barrier.
Maintains properties over a wide temperature range.
High chemical resistance, well suited for harsh environments.
Non-stick, low friction qualities for clean and efficient material release.

Teflon® PFA (Perfluoroalkoxy Alkanes):
Slightly more permeable than FEP, offering a different balance in gas transfer applications.
Can withstand higher temperatures than FEP.
Exhibits high chemical resistance, with added UV protection.
Balances flexibility and strength, suitable for demanding physical applications.

Factors Influencing Gas Permeability: Teflon® Encapsulated O-rings

  • Wall Thickness: A critical factor; thicker walls generally mean lower permeability.
  • Molecular Structure and Crystallinity: Variations in molecular makeup and crystallinity between FEP and PFA influence their permeability, with FEP being less permeable.
  • Temperature Effects: Elevated temperatures increase the permeation rates in both materials, with PFA experiencing more pronounced changes due to its lower crystallinity.
  1. Molecular Structure Differences: PFA and FEP are both types of fluoropolymers, but they have different molecular structures. PFA has a backbone chain similar to PTFE (Polytetrafluoroethylene), which allows for some more flexibility and movement within the polymer chain compared to FEP. This increased flexibility can lead to slightly larger free volume within the polymer matrix, which in turn can allow for easier gas diffusion.
  2. Crystallinity and Density: FEP tends to have a higher crystallinity and density than PFA. Higher crystallinity in polymers generally results in lower free volume, thus reducing the spaces through which gas molecules can diffuse. Therefore, the lower crystallinity of PFA can result in slightly higher permeability.
  3. Temperature Effects: The permeability of both PFA and FEP can vary with temperature. However, due to the differences in their molecular structure and crystallinity, these variations can be more pronounced in PFA, especially at higher temperatures where its lower crystallinity might allow for increased mobility of gas molecules.
  4. Manufacturing Process and Material Purity: Variations in the manufacturing process and the purity of the material can also affect permeability. Any differences in processing between PFA and FEP could contribute to differences in their permeability characteristics.

 

Elevated Temperature Effects:

1. Increased Molecular Mobility: As the temperature rises, the molecular mobility within the polymer increases. This increased mobility can create more free volume within the polymer structure, allowing gas molecules to diffuse through the material more easily.

2. Expansion of Material: Higher temperatures can cause the material to expand slightly. This expansion can lead to an increase in the free volume within the polymer matrix, further contributing to the diffusion of gas molecules.

3. Diffusion Coefficient Changes: The diffusion coefficient, a measure of how easily a gas permeates through a material, generally increases with temperature. This is because the kinetic energy of the gas molecules is higher, leading to more effective diffusion.

4. Altered Polymer Structure: Prolonged exposure to high temperatures can potentially alter the polymer structure, especially if the temperature approaches the material’s glass transition or melting point. This can lead to permanent changes in permeability.

5. Impact on Crystallinity: Temperature can also affect the crystallinity of these polymers. For instance, elevated temperatures might lead to a decrease in crystallinity, which typically results in increased permeability due to the larger free volume in less crystalline regions.

To summarize, elevated temperatures generally lead to increased permeation rates in Teflon PFA and FEP. However, the impact can vary depending on the exact temperature range, the duration of exposure, and the i properties of each material. It’s important for engineers and designers to consider these factors, especially in applications where the materials are expected to operate under high-temperature conditions.

It’s important to note that while PFA is generally more permeable than FEP, both materials are still considered to have low permeability compared to many other polymers. The choice between PFA and FEP  ewould depend on the specific requirements of the application, including considerations of temperature resistance, chemical resistance, flexibility, and, of course, permeability.

Vapor Transmission Rates of Teflon™ FEP film (25μm thickness per ASTM E-96, modified) at specified temperatures:

  • Acetic Acid (35°C/95°F): 0.41 g/100 sq in per 24 hours
  • Acetone (35°C/95°F): 0.95 g/100 sq in per 24 hours
  • Acetophenone (25°C/77°F): 0.50 g/100 sq in per 24 hours
  • Benzene (35°C/95°F): 0.64 g/100 sq in per 24 hours
  • Carbon Tetrachloride (35°C/95°F): 0.31 g/100 sq in per 24 hours
  • Ethyl Acetate (35°C/95°F): 0.76 g/100 sq in per 24 hours
  • Hexane (35°C/95°F): 0.56 g/100 sq in per 24 hours
  • Hydrochloric Acid, 20% (25°C/77°F): <0.01 g/100 sq in per 24 hours
  • Piperidine (25°C/77°F): 0.04 g/100 sq in per 24 hours
  • Red Fuming Nitric Acid (25°C/77°F): 7.5 – 1.4 g/100 sq in per 24 hours
  • Sodium Hydroxide, 50% (25°C/77°F): <0.01 g/100 sq in per 24 hours
  • Sulfuric Acid, 98% (25°C/77°F): 0.00001 g/100 sq in per 24 hours
  • Water (39.5°C/103.1°F): 0.40 g/100 sq in per 24 hours (Source: Teflon.com)